housing

Stated that residents chose the neighborhood for its quiet, low-density feel and quality of life.

Asked whether school and traffic impact studies are completed before approval or if the city approves first and deals with problems later.

Expressed concerns about the lack of alternative site options, school crowding, increased traffic, and whether rezoning guarantees low-income housing affordability.

Voiced worry that apartments would lower property values and increase street trash and congestion.

Questioned whether the site truly qualified as underutilized and highlighted that local schools are already impacted by growth.

Argued that the project burdens infrastructure without a center divider on Locan Avenue and noted unanimous neighborhood opposition.

Shared personal experiences as a low-income resident and supported housing opportunities for all income levels.

Expressed disappointment over negative framing of low-income residents and traffic risks.

Inquired about the handling of housing trust fund money and potential impact on property values.

Spoke on behalf of the BIA, stating the mixed-income ordinance acts as a tax on new homebuyers.

Voiced opposition to the mixed-income housing mandate and infrastructure timing challenges.

Noted that added housing costs could reduce home building supply and raise prices.

Flagged item 3 regarding affordable housing funds and questioned housing trust fund balances and RHN site removals.

Expressed concerns about housing affordability, accessory dwelling units, and the challenges working-class residents face in purchasing homes.